Tag Archives: ethics

Uncategorized

Lufbery Circle Politics

2 Comments

A “Lufbery circle” was originally a defensive tactic, but today is a term in air combat for a phenomenon where the combatants are stuck in the fight across from each other. Each is unable to reach a firing solution, yet leaving the circle will immediately put them at a disadvantage.

tumblr_nrpaphLJO51tfbj78o1_1280

(Image: Gervais Raul Lufbery, WWI flying ace.  He would feel quite lost in today’s politics)

The “lizard brain’s” reaction to a Lufbery is to stay where you are. Keep turning and hope something changes. It is by its nature an energy-losing maneuver, continually spiraling to the floor. It will almost always get you killed because you run out of gas, run out of altitude/into a rock, or get shot by another guy who happens to poke his nose into your merry-go-round.

The four major divisions of Congress (ideological progressive/socialist left, ideological conservative right, establishment left, and establishment right) are in a Lufbery. The smaller factions have very little influence except perhaps the GOP Libertarians who tend to hang out in the ideological conservative right.

The establishment left and right are party before principle. They will always do what is most likely to help them gain or maintain seats, power, and money.

The ideological left and right are principle over party, but there is one big difference between the two (beyond their values).

The essential nature of the ideological left includes a large state and centralized power, and that lends itself to them working together with the establishment left. However, the essential nature of the ideological right is a smaller state and decentralized power, which lends itself to conflict with the establishment right.  Thus, the right side of the aisle tends to be at a disadvantage toward pushing traditionally “conservative” agenda, even when it is in the majority.

The result is this Lufberry circle. Everybody is chasing each other’s power. There will be some gains, and some losses, but largely I would expect to see the same results – a continued spiral to the floor.

Regardless of where you are in the various political spectra, the only way out of a Lufbery is to take the risk to exit the circle, separate, do something bold and unexpected, and pitch back into the fight with aggressive ingenuity, something for which few of our elected representatives have shown a willingness or aptitude.

We need virtue-based leaders.

Uncategorized

How to Destroy the United States

2 Comments

In years past, different people, groups, and nations have tried to destroy the United States of America.  They’ve used conventional forces, guerrilla tactics, and, increasingly over the past years, terrorism.

Invasion

But today, if I wanted to destroy the United States, I wouldn’t use force.  Instead, I’d use the people against themselves.  I’d use not just their fears and insecurities, but also their pride and selfish desires to create division and friction between different groups within the country.  In targeting these different groups, I would use both real and manufactured criteria to define them.  I’d get them to define themselves by their financial status and occupation, by the color of their skin or country of their birth, by political party or even by on which side of the street they lived.

Now, this is nothing new.  It’s been tried to various levels of success in the past in this country and others.  We even have a new word in our Dictionary to describe one particularly successful venture from the 90s: “Balkanization.”  But today, I could be much more effective because of the additional leverage I could apply through advances in information technology, mass communication, and social media.

These are all tools that have advanced in capability and availability, rapidly and well beyond the pace of any ethical framework or practice with which to wield them.  Because of this, an entity, group, or even individual has carte blanche to say nearly anything, and to have those words or images transmitted instantly and globally.  Meanwhile, the consumer willingly makes himself available 24/7 to these unfiltered or even targeted messages through our enraptured embrace of personal electronics in lieu of personal relationships.  Moreover, that consumer is now able to interact with the messenger and, even more importantly for our desired ends, other consumers.  To make the attack even more effective, these messages can be transmitted either anonymously or with false attribution.

One way to execute this strategy would be by first creating several online anonymous profiles for legitimate news sites and social media outlets.  I’d make these identities represent both sides of a divide I sought to exploit or even create.  I might give them names like “BLM of Central Texas,” “TrueBlue Cop,” “Concerned Mom,” “Aryan666,” “In Christ Alone,” “Gangsta,” or… well, you probably get the picture.  If I had time, I might spend some time creating a backstory by commenting somewhat benignly on various issues, building a friends list, or even a “fanbase.”  Yet, to be realistic, few people check very deeply into sources these days, so I could probably spend my time and efforts more effectively simply by creating more shallow online identities.

Then, I would look for my opportunity – a current event that illuminated that targeted divide.  If no such event happened, I might even manufacture one with a contrived or adapted news story I reported and transmitted on a fictitious news site.  Again, fact-checking and contemplation are not strengths of my targeted population – the American people’s desire to get ahead of a near-instantaneous news cycle has outpaced their appetite for accuracy or even conscious thought.

A ripe opportunity would be the stories surrounding the recent officer-involved shootings, protests, and ultimately, the slaying of police officers.

Now, I’d commence my attack.  I’d make some inflammatory comments about black men killed by police – ranging from mild to wild.  I’d attack their character, and then black people in general. My hope would be that I’d get a response from other commenters, but I wouldn’t need to – I would also pit my online identities against each other.  They are cheap and expendable.

Simultaneously, I’d make statements about the cops involved, and continue to attack police officers in general.  Again, I’d hope someone would bite the troll bait, but I’d engage with empty personae as well, just to get the fires rolling.

I’d do the same on the fictitious organizational pages, lending credence to the growing appearance that these thoughts were held not by individuals but entire groups.

I’d post links to videos of “violence porn” – police brutality and shootings, looting in Ferguson, gang and drug executions.  I’d use the power of Google to find other links to stories, old or new, legitimate or false, to fan the flames.

Oh, and memes… I’d make lots of memes.  It seems easy these days to boil complex controversies into a couple lines of text written in bold letters on the photo of a Hollywood personality or generic protagonist/antagonist – and post those also.  The beauty of a meme is it is so shareable, and by simplifying the argument it sharpens the divides.

Soon, incredibly soon due to the modern phenomena of media, I wouldn’t need to do anything but sit back and look for the next divide I wanted to exploit.  If the fires of hatred, mistrust, and fear seemed to lessen, I might stoke them again, but that is unlikely.  Again, in the absence of ethical frameworks and practice, social media is like a drought-baked forest waiting for a match.

That’s what I’d do if I wanted to destroy this country.  It’s a good thing I don’t, because I’m pretty sure I could be successful.

In fact, this strategy is already in play by others, and we’re playing right into their hands.  By doing so, we’re allowing a small number of foes the luxury of a force multiplier heretofore unseen – the ability to turn masses of people against themselves rapidly and with little expenditure of material or personal capital.

Take a few minutes (and only a few minutes) and check out the comments on stories about current controversies.  You will read words you would never hear in even the most heated of in-person intoxicated arguments.  Angry, provocative, inciting, and hateful messages fomenting increasingly angry, provocative, inciting, and hateful responses.  If you don’t think a lot of this is intentional, you are fooling yourself.

The countermeasure is simple, but not easy.  In this age of instantly-available media, we need to take time to turn it off.  We need to take the time to meet people face-to-face, to shake hands, hear concerns, discuss differences, and have vigorous debate when necessary.

This is not efficient.  It is not quick.  It is not convenient.  It is not easy.

It is, however, necessary.

What is Virtue-Based Leadership?

What is Virtue-Based Leadership?

Leave a comment

Contemporary theories on leadership, including “Servant Leadership” and “Transformational Leadership,” focus upon the interaction of the leader, followers, and organization toward the accomplishment of a mission.  And at first glance (or even after years of consideration), this makes sense, and has led to a vigorous debate as to which are the correct foci and which of these factors (leader, people, organization, and mission) should be take priority over the other.

Mission-oriented leadership theories and practices can be effective, allowing leaders to shape clear pathways towards specific and, ideally, measurable goals and objectives.  Pure mission focus, however, often results in the neglect of the organization, and the people and resources comprising that organization.

Organization-focused leadership, on the other hand, excels in developing structures and procedures to accomplish the mission with the available people and resources.  Efficient process is often the result, but often either (or both) the mission and people are neglected.

People-centric leadership concentrates upon the needs, capabilities, and development of those people making up the organization, with many contemporary theories including “Servant” and “Transformational” leadership championing the empowerment of those people to achieve their best.  The danger here, of course, is the neglect of mission or organization in the interests of that achievement.

Perhaps the most dysfunctional, yet sadly most common, of all leadership practices are those which are leader-centric.  For sure, it is important for the leader to embrace opportunities for self-improvement, development, or even fulfillment; however, the danger of prioritizing the leader is the slippery slope to selfishness and careerism.

Regardless of which of these priorities is set, the result often is not true leadership but manipulation, manipulation of the lower-priority entities to achieve the highest priorities.  Thus, a mission-focused leader tends to find ways to manipulate people and organization to achieve the mission.  A people-focused leader manipulates the mission and organization to help the people.  An organization-focused leader manipulates people and mission.  And a self-focused leader manipulates all three.

Nor is the answer a neo-situational leadership theory in which these four different priorities are selected and interchanged depending on the changing climate or situation.  Even if perfectly-balanced, such a theory is only an ineffective bandage on a serious wound.

Instead, I would like to champion what I call Virtue-Based Leadership, asserting that the correct answer to the dilemma of prioritizing mission, people, organization, or leader is “none of the above.”  Instead, true leadership can only occur when the leader starts with a foundation of virtue – the identification of what is right and noble, the establishment of that virtue as the ultimate goal, and the constant striving for that goal.

Thus, instead of focusing on the mission, the leader must first evaluate and define the mission on its virtues.  Rather than focusing on the organization, the leader must first identify then apply the principles of virtue to its structure and ethics.  Instead of focusing on the desires of the people, the leader must help set virtuous goals in their development and care.  And, perhaps most importantly, the leader must strive for virtue in his or her own life and actions.

But what is that virtue, how is it discovered?  That is another question for a future article!

Click here to learn more about the author.

Click here for upcoming speaking engagements or events.

Click here to learn more about arranging a talk, interview, article, or consultation on Virtue-Based Leadership.

Faith, The Constitution, Veterans and Military

Gold Star Families of NH Speech

Leave a comment

[Note: The speech above was given in 2013 to an event honoring Gold Star families in New Hampshire while I was still on active duty]

Thank you Gold Star families, for your sacrifice, the sacrifice that so few understand or comprehend.

And let’s thank God for blessing us with the gift of heroes, who have risked all and given all in the service of this country and its blessings, which themselves are a blessing from God.

In the news we are hearing talk about some nonsense that military members are not allowed to speak on matters of faith.

Balderdash.

I’m thankful that the Pentagon has clarified this, that there is a difference between forced proselytizing – trying to coerce someone into accepting your religion – and honest dialogue or even evangelism.

It is impossible for anyone, and definitely impossible for me, to speak honestly from the heart and NOT express one’s faith in the process.  That’s true whether you are a Christian, a Jew, a Muslim, a Budhist, a Confucian, an agnostic or an atheist.  If you speak what you believe to be true, isn’t that speaking about your faith?

And if you refuse to speak about what you believe to be true, what would we call that?

In fact, like the heroes no longer with us, I was required to memorize the Code of Conduct of the United States Fighting Force, a code to which I am legally bound, which starts with:

I am an American, fighting in the forces which defend my country and our way of life.  I am prepared to give my life in their defense.

And closes thus:

I will never forget that I am an American, fighting for freedom, responsible for my actions, and dedicated to the principles which made my country free. I will trust in my GOD and in the United States of America.

And I want to speak in truth and honesty to you today, and because of that, I’m going to have bring my faith into it.   Perhaps that is because the value of sacrifice is so central to my faith.

And as you know all too well, it is our Gold Star families who define sacrifice in the world today.

Your loved ones took that Code of Conduct to its ultimate end, giving their lives in the defense of their country and our way of life.  When the trumpet called, they answered.  When the attack came, they advanced to the sound of gunfire.  When all hell broke loose, they were there to put it back in shackles.  And in the end, they gave their lives so that others might live.

And for that, we honor them.  And we honor you also, the families of these warriors, who have sacrificed so much.

In fact, in my faith, it is Abraham, not Isaac, who is remembered as the honored for his sacrifice.  Because he was willing to put his beloved son on the altar.

And in my faith, I believe that God chose to use sacrifice as defining aspect of His character, so much so that He sacrificed His own Son to be tortured and hung on a cross so that we could be reconciled to Him.  He gave up his best to be killed for a world that didn’t deserve it, a world where many continue to fail to appreciate that sacrifice.

And that aspect of His character, the character of the God I serve, is what I see in you, the Gold Star families here today.

Because sacrifice is what military families have done and continue to do every day.

Because in a time where the military has gone to war while America has gone to the mall, a time where some have given all while most have neither been asked, nor volunteered to sacrifice more than putting a “support the troops” magnet on their trunk, you have sacrificed dearly.

Because while we in the military serve.  You sacrifice.

We strap on a jet, or shoulder a ruck and rifle, or sail on a ship, or do a thousand other things that we are called to do as not only our duty but our passion.  That is service.

But what YOU do and have done is sacrifice.

Military families sacrifice every time their loved one walks out the door.

…every time a ship sails.

…every time an aircraft takes off.

…every time your loved one says, “I have to go.”

…every time you say goodbye, whether in person, or on the phone, or on Skype.

…every time a staff car drives into the neighborhood and you say, “Please, don’t stop here.”

…every time a notification team walks up to a door.

…and in the days, months, and years afterwards, our Gold Star families continue to bear the burden of that sacrifice.

We serve.  You have sacrificed.  And in a country that sometimes seems not to understand or value that sacrifice deeply enough, we are here today to honor you.

To tell you that when the honor guardsman handed you that folded flag and said, “On behalf of a grateful nation,” those words were not empty.

To tell you that though some are too caught up in their own selfish needs and pursuits, that we honor your loved ones who gave all in service to things so much greater than themselves, and that we honor you, not just for allowing them to serve, but raising them, growing them, encouraging them, and molding them into the brave men and women they were, driven to serve things greater than themselves.

To tell you that, in the words of Hub McCann, there are some things worth believing in.  “…That honor, courage, and virtue mean everything; that power and money, money and power mean nothing; that good always triumphs over evil… that love… true love never dies.”

To remind ourselves that just as your sacrifice continues every day, our support for you needs to continue every day.  Whether that support is s phone call, or stopping by to watch the kids, to bring a meal, help with an errand, or to pray, or just to stop and sit with you.

As I prepared to talk to you today, I reached out to Gold Star families I know personally, and I want to pass along words from two amazing women, whose husbands died in service to our country.

Tami, whose husband Dee died last year in Southwest Asia, asked me to pass this to you, our Gold Star families:

You are as much a hero as your loved one lost. Know that it may seem that people forget. In general when events like this happen the people around you get to choose how much they are going to allow the event to affect them–you don’t get to choose. Know in your heart that everything that happened matters–your loved one matters (not mattered)…You are not alone! You have good friends (some whose relationship blossoms after the event), you have family (though you will see that the relationship with your family has changed too), but most of all you have people who are on the same walk as you. Embrace those who have been there–use their support and tell them your darkest thoughts that you need to get out. These are the people who have thought that too and can tell you how they have gotten through it. Know that God is good and choosing JOY is a difficult decision (usually the more difficult one) but it is worth it.

Leigh, who lost her husband Nick over three years ago added this:

Also, know that you are not alone in this. There are many that are walking the same journey as you, and we are for you, to encourage you and let you know it will be okay…because it will. I have walked this journey for 3 1/2 years with two very young children. It’s not always easy, but God has truly blessed our lives and has been amazing in his provisions for our “new” life.

And to those of us who support Gold Star families, they both asked us to remember that the sacrifice continues well past the time that most of the immediate assistance ends.  Take the time to reach out, whether they are next door or across the country.  Remember that, though wounds heal over time, the loss remains.

Nick and Dee were good friends of mine, warriors like your loved ones who chose to serve in one of the most challenging times of our nation’s history.  Like your loved ones, they lived the code and never gave up the faith, and we owe it to them never to give up our support for you, and our honor both for their lives and your sacrifice.

I’d like to close with words from a much greater leader than me to a mother who lost her sons in war.  His words are more eloquent, and his burden of leadership greater than any I have carried.

“I feel how weak and fruitless must be any word of mine which should attempt to beguile you from the grief of a loss so overwhelming. But I cannot refrain from tendering you the consolation that may be found in the thanks of the Republic they died to save.

I pray that our Heavenly Father may assuage the anguish of your bereavement, and leave you only the cherished memory of the loved and lost, and the solemn pride that must be yours to have laid so costly a sacrifice upon the altar of freedom.

Yours, very sincerely and respectfully,

Abraham Lincoln”

May God hold you in His comforting hands

May God spur us into action to support you

And may God continue to bless the United States of America.

Note: The speech above was given in 2013 to an event honoring Gold Star families in New Hampshire while I was still on active duty.

Click here to learn more about the author

Click here for upcoming events

Faith, The Constitution, Veterans and Military

The Hollowing of our Force

Leave a comment

By Patrick Testerman

The vast majority of US politicians, even those who are most vehement in their demands for “separation of church and state,” end their speeches with the words, “God Bless America.”

Indeed, God has blessed us.  Our founders were explicit in their recognition of God’s abundant blessings on this land, His graceful endowment of certain inalienable rights, and His establishment of government for the express purpose of securing them.

Later, in our Constitution, our founders would further this ideal, stating that the union must secure these blessings, not only for themselves, but for their posterity – those who would follow. Us.

And so we, their posterity, must address security in that sense – one that seeks not to preserve comforts or riches, but instead to protect the rights granted to all mankind. “Stewardship” of the blessing of liberty, if you will, because a chief function of a people created to honor and glorify our Creator, is to be good stewards of His gifts. And I believe one of those gifts exists in the form of our military and its men and women.

We are not being good stewards.

Even as DESERT SHIELD and later DESERT STORM were beginning what would become twenty-five years of continuous combat operations by our nations’ military, with no forseeable end in the near future, our military began suffering cuts of manpower, equipment, supplies, and training.

This hollowing accelerated under President Clinton, to the point that as terrorists were planning to attack us on September 11th, 2001, we had reduced our military’s size by over 30%, and even after increasing our forces slightly during the War on Terror, we have again begun the decline.

This might have been acceptable had we decreased our military’s mission proportionately. Yet, we did the opposite, adding operations not only in Iraq and Kuwait, but Zaire, Sierra Leone, Bosnia, Somalia, Macedonia, Haiti, Liberia, Central African Republic, Albania, Congo, Gabon, Cambodia, Guinea-Bassau, Kenya, Tanzania, Afghanistan, Sudan, East Timor, Serbia, Kosovo, Nigeria, Yemen, Cote d’Ivoire, Georgia, Djibouti, Pakistan, Lebanon, Libya, Uganda, Jordan, Chad, Mali, Syria, and so many other places not even known, as well as the seas between them and the air and space above.

This has stressed our military to its breaking point. With our active forces stretched thin, and our reserves not only committed, but overcommitted, it is no longer possible to allow units to redeploy, replenish, and reconstitute between deployments. Multiple deployments in a career are the standard, and eight or more extended combat tours are common. Military families have become the sacrificial lamb for the idols of our comfort and ambition, and each day, 22 veterans who the enemy couldn’t kill on the battlefield are killing themselves.

This is a grave threat to our national security indeed.

There are many who can and will address this threat eloquently and expertly – more eloquently and expertly than can I. But I’d like to address another related threat that I believe is just as dangerous to our military and to our nation’s security as the physical hollowing of the force. It is the spiritual and moral hollowing of our force.

This threat is not new. In fact, at the very birth of our nation, with our young Continental forces fresh from early victories in Boston and Fort Moultrie, and encouraged by the recent creation of the Declaration of Independence, General Washington saw a problem in his Army.

On August 3rd, 1776, certainly the General was concerned with the lack of manpower, equipment, supplies, and training. But what drove him to write a general order that day, to be broadcast to the entire army, were offenses against the spiritual and moral foundations. Not only did he believe those offenses to be prejudicial to good order and discipline, but in his words:

“…we can have little hopes of the blessing of Heaven on our Arms, if we insult it by our impiety, and folly”

Despite the misguided and misinformed messages from some today that demand our military and its leaders be amoral and aspiritual, General Washington knew then what is true now: That a force without a firm spiritual and moral foundation would be doomed to failure, or even worse, destined for success in which it would become an easy pawn of tyranny rather than a champion of liberty.

You see, though troops, arms, equipment, supplies, logistics, training, and other assets are the flesh, the organs, the muscles and sinew of a military, the moral and spiritual foundation provide its skeleton and its direction. And without that structure, without that direction, the force cannot be one for good.

In fact, General Washington believed the moral and spiritual foundations to be so important that years before, as a Colonel in the Virginia Regiment, he had championed and won the institution of a professional chaplaincy, a force multiplier he brought with him to the Continental Army, and one which has survived, despite terrible assaults in recent years, to today.

The Continental Congress agreed with him, and later passed a resolution stating:

“Whereas true religion and good morals are the only solid foundations of public liberty and happiness…

…Resolved, That all officers in the Army of the United States be, and hereby are strictly enjoined, to see that the good and wholesome rules provided for the discountenancing of profaneness and vice, and the preservation of morals among the soldiers are duly and punctually observed.” – Continental Congress, 12 Oct 1778

Now, let’s be honest. I’m a retired fighter pilot. I’ve spent many an hour in squadron bars, officer’s clubs, and other locales home and abroad. I’m not about to tell you that the military is or ever has been free of profaneness or vice.

But because of its spiritual and moral foundations, foundations that start with a person’s first oath of enlistment, ending with the prayer “So help me God,” the military has had at its core a strength to rein in those who stray from its moral compass. Good order and discipline is ineffective without a definition of “good.”

Yet today, we attempt to emasculate our chaplaincy, doing our best to forbid them from practicing their faith or even forcing them to act against it. We attempt to muzzle our military leaders, telling them – wrongly – that public profession of faith is somehow unconstitutional.

If it were unconstitutional for an official to do so, by the way, where were the cries of our founders to silence our first President when he proclaimed publicly,

“it is the duty of all Nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey his will, to be grateful for his benefits, and humbly to implore his protection and favor”

Why did the founders not shout down Thomas Jefferson, the oft-quoted genesis of the “Separation of Church and State” doctrine, when he said?

“The practice of morality being necessary for the well-being of society, [our Creator] has taken care to impress its precepts so indelibly on our hearts that they shall not be effaced by the subtleties of our brain.” – Thomas Jefferson, 1809

or

[I consider] ethics; as well as religion, as supplements to the law in the government of man.” – Thomas Jefferson, 1824

Years later, where was the public outcry when General Eisenhower finished his address to the troops on D-Day, with:

“…let us beseech the blessing of Almighty God upon this great and noble undertaking.”

Not only is it not unconstitutional for our leaders, civilian and military, to speak from their faith… it is unconscionable for them not to!

Because when the spiritual and moral foundation of our military is attacked and allowed to crumble, the consequences are grave. We see those consequences on the battlefield, we see them in garrison, and we see them at home. And many who have worked so hard to remove any reference to the moral, to the boundaries between right and wrong, are the loudest voices when those boundaries are crossed.

This is the spiritual and moral hollowing of our force.

We see it today when the perverse and profane are lauded, while the noble and virtuous are derided.

When a convicted traitor is provided access to gender change therapy while combat veterans are denied basic healthcare.

When our military profits from sales of pornography in its exchanges, but removes bibles from Navy Lodges.

When military personnel in uniform are encouraged to march at a Gay Pride parade, but prohibited from helping the Boy Scouts.

When our leaders move to provide abortions through military hospitals and healthcare insurance, while reducing promised benefits to military retirees.

When we add more wars onto the shoulders of our armed forces – in Libya, Syria, Northern Iraq, and elsewhere – without having the integrity to follow Constitutional process, and then prosecute our troops when they rightly assert their Constitutional rights.

When fourteen Americans including an unborn baby are killed, and thirty others wounded by a lone terrorist in a room full of soldiers we have unarmed, and we continue to say it is wrong to allow our men and women in uniform to be armed on post.

When another terrorist kills four US Marines and a Sailor, again on our own soil, and we again say it is wrong to allow our men and women in uniform to be armed.

These are symptoms of the spiritual and moral hollowing of our force. And as true today as it was in 1776, if we allow it to continue, our military will either be doomed to fail, or, if it succeeds, it will become a force for despotism rather than liberty.

Now, as a former commander, I will tell you that the worst thing you can do to a leader is to present a problem without a solution.

So here is my solution.

It’s not easy.

Those of you still in military service: Uphold your oath. Know the Constitution you have sworn to support and defend. Learn the basics of Constitutional law. Know the difference between expression and insubordination, between free exercise and establishment. And then execute. Do what is right. Live your faith. Do what is honoring to your oath, and to the God you asked to help you uphold it. Do not waver.

To those of you who are in political office, or aspire to such, including those presidential candidates here today, I say the same. Be willing to sacrifice your political careers for what is right. Be humble before your God. Fight for what is right. Fight for the troops. Never, ever submit to the most dangerous lie of politics and leadership: That if you avoid doing what is right today, you’ll have a chance to do greater good tomorrow.

To the rest of us. Those who provide powers to the government through our consent as the governed: Be involved. Be present. When necessary, be loud. Very loud. Be known at your elected representatives’ local offices. Pray for them. When they do right, encourage them. When they waiver, bolster them. When they fail, take them to task and remove them from office.

And to all of us: Act justly, love mercy, and walk humbly with our God.

And let us all pray that we would turn away from the impiety and folly that insults our God, so that we can again ask his blessings on our endeavors. And may God then bless our troops, our leaders, and the United States of America.

About the author

Upcoming events

What is Virtue-Based Leadership?

Virtuous Leadership – Hitting the Right Target

Leave a comment

When shooting a firearm accurately, it is essential to align the front and rear sights, the barrel, and the target. And when all these are in alignment, with proper stance, grip, and trigger control, the hammer drops, the firing pin hits the primer, and the bullet goes exactly where it is supposed to.

Sometimes, it’s really that easy. I have a friend who collects old World War II firearms, and one day at my son’s request he brought his restored British Bren to our back pasture. He mounted it on the big, heavy tripod, lined up the sights on the target, and all my son had to do with his first shot was pull the trigger to make sure that milk jug filled with water exploded.

But things don’t always line up perfectly. Often, whether the firearm is new out of the box, or has been bumped in transit, we find that the sights need to be adjusted because they’re not lined up well with the barrel. Sometimes the target isn’t where we expected, so we need to shift our sights. At other times, wind, distance, or other environmental factors require us to adjust our aim as well.

What we don’t do, however, is move the target.

This is the same with leadership. Leadership is very easy when everything lines up perfectly and all we have to do is pull the trigger. But the true test of the leader is what he or she does when the legal, moral, ethical, and right don’t line up. And when that happens, it requires a virtuous leader, one who is able to discern the right, to make the tough decisions to do that right rather than redefining the target.

Be that virtuous leader.

Please click here for more information on the author.

Faith, The Constitution, Veterans and Military, What is Virtue-Based Leadership?

Crisis and Courage

Leave a comment

[Note: This post is from an article I wrote two years ago which seems to resonate with today’s events, especially as we look into the new year.]

The country is in crisis.

The long and bitter war against a foreign enemy might not be the most severe peril facing the Americans. Just as dangerous, and perhaps more so, is the sharp divide between factions within a disorganized domestic government.

Individual, corporate, cultural, religious, and regional agendas threaten to destroy ambitious hopes for an independent and prosperous nation, one blessed beyond compare with natural and human resources. Politicians play to special interests, many more interested in how they can pad their own coffers and power base than the good of the people of their constituencies or the nation itself.

The citizenry is similarly divided, ideological disputes going beyond discussions and debates to the point that they often dissolve into violence. Distrust for government and authority is at an all-time high.

The enemies of America laugh at it, and many suggest the country will collapse on itself.

Hope dissolves. Despair grows.

Yet 15 years later, the United States of America would emerge from these crises under bold leadership with an innovative and unique constitutionally-based government. Over the next two centuries, she would rise to become the world’s most powerful and prosperous nation. How did this happen, and what lessons from that history can we apply to today, where our nation faces such similar challenges?

The first element was the presence of those bold leaders. People with vision, moral courage, and often bravery in the face of death. Leaders, not just in Philadelphia and then Washington DC, but even more importantly, leaders at the regional, state, city, neighborhood and family levels who didn’t give up their own needs and desires completely, but because of that vision, moral courage, and bravery were willing to strive for the greater good of a nation built upon godly principles.

Second, those bold leaders were able to mold the mob into a team. They did this by convincing the people that, despite whatever the competing agendas of diverse states and localities might be, the consequences of remaining divided while facing a foe as powerful as were the combined economic, military, and industrial powers of Great Britain were too great. And so these differences were laid aside to some measure, at least for the time, and the people rallied in common purpose.

This combination of bold leadership with a bold message that was the precise formula needed in 1775 was repeated time and again in our nation’s history. Whether it was the war that threatened to tear our country apart from within, two wars that threatened the stability of the entire world, a Depression that threatened our economic survival, or nuclear brinksmanship that threatened the world’s very existence, bold leaders with bold visions rallied our nation to victory.

This is the same medicine our country needs for the challenges we face today: both our external perils and our internal divisions.

Our leaders must both understand our ills and propose ambitious cures, but it is even more critical that they be able to inspire and encourage. Hope, not blame. Vision, not derision.

Finally, our leaders must do this with realistic optimism, not cynical pessimism. Because this is the United States of America, still blessed by our Creator beyond compare with physical and human resources. And if we are willing both to acknowledge those blessings and to rise to the responsibilities that those blessings merit, we will emerge from these challenges just as strongly today as we have in the past.

About the author

Upcoming events

Contact and guest speaker information

Faith, What is Virtue-Based Leadership?

Reversing America’s Decline

Leave a comment

Without doubt, America is in decline in all four of her classic instruments of national power – Diplomacy, Information/Intelligence, Military, and Economy.   I suggest this is a direct consequence of an extended period in which our leaders not only have failed to follow the principles of Virtue-Based Leadership, but have been openly hostile to them.

Yet we are also in a key election year when we have exceptional opportunities to influence, shape, and select our leaders, and to demand virtuous leadership from them. We are also on the crux of a revival in our families, communities, and nation which I pray will lead to action not only this year, but in building and preparing virtuous leaders for the future.

I am excited to see a return to such leadership in this country today, and to the development of virtuous leaders for tomorrow, and am actively seeking opportunities to champion this vision.

If this message resonates with you, or you are interested in learning more, I invite you to attend my presentation at the ICON lecture series in March, 2016 (http://www.iconlectureseries.com/), or at other events to be announced soon.

About the author.